Imagine working with a team of experts ranging from implementation, data management and technology to operations, media strategy and communication. Such an environment naturally brings together a well-rounded team with a cross-cutting set of expertise. But here’s the caveat, each team has its own KPIs and reporting lines, with very distinct hierarchies and slightly different organizational goals. Each team brings its own strengths to the table, but then how do you develop a centralized system that ensures everyone is aligned towards the same goal? How do you make sure these large organizations work in harmony, solving roadblocks for one another instead of moving in parallel towards their own end goals?

This scenario is common across development sector projects where different entities are providing niche grants and funding for targeted interventions. While the possibilities are endless, things can quickly become muddled when one team works in a silo, without visibility into what others are dealing with. If the data system is stuck, for example, it can blur the efforts of every team, from strategy development to implementation and eventually impact evaluation.

A practical way to navigate this is by developing a baseline but clear scorecard, with defined KPIs, deadlines and goals assigned to each team across all stakeholders. The scorecard should be designed in a way that ranks and prioritizes tasks based on urgency and timelines, creating a structured path towards a shared end goal. The initiation and follow-up of this scorecard may require some form of governmental stocktake to ensure transparency, and regular reviews can help establish it as a trusted yardstick of progress across all stakeholders. Once the review and collection process is consistently harmonized and institutionalized, it can continue to function smoothly even when key stakeholders change.

The scorecard is not just a red, yellow, green traffic light, rather it becomes a cohesive and comprehensive instrument to track performance across domains on critical indicators. When a bottleneck is identified, it does not remain isolated, its impact becomes visible across the system, affecting the pace of progress for all stakeholders. This shared understanding of the process encourages collective problem solving and leads to quicker and sharper responses across the project.

In the end, accountability in a multi-donor environment is not just about tracking progress, it is about creating a system where teams are aware of each other, responsive to shared challenges and aligned towards a common outcome.

‍